Category Archives: Uncategorized

Aesthetic and Academic Appreciation: Jeffrey Lipsky

Amberly's Room by jeFF Lipsky

Amberly's Room by jeFF Lipsky

JeFF’s work is fascinating from both aesthetic and academic perspectives. My introduction to jeFF’s work was via Second Life, an online Virtual Community. His art collection was the subject of a critical review I wrote in my studies as a Graduate Student at Emerson College. The paper, “Filthy and Digital Art,” examined notions of “high and low art,” in the digital medium.

My attraction to JeFF’s work was never purely academic, however. I chose his work as my subject because it was visually stunning, intellectually stimulating, and fascinating in its social context. JeFF’s art has a very physical form of depth, as he works in layers to embed beauty and meaning in each piece. Sometimes the inspiration of the work is visually apparent, sometimes it is not. I’ve heard others say they like when they can visually connect what they’re seeing in his art with objects or locations they’ve seen in real life. I like when I look at his work and, instead of seeing ‘things,’ per se, I am moved to simply… connect. I can look at JeFF’s work and feel events, moments, memories, and life. I take in each of the layers separately and, at the same time, all at once. It is as though faith is bringing the seen and unseen together, creating a sensation of being swept through the canvas and into the emotion that inspired every color choice and every stroke of pastel that created the work. It is still and yet in motion, it is physical but significantly emotional. JeFF’s work is compelling, in every sense of the word.

His work, and it’s role in the social context of Second Life was also the inspiration for a paper I wrote at Emerson. The general thrust of the argument was that jeFF’s artwork in its original state (abstract pastel) carried connotations of “high art,” because the medium uses “fine art tools,” a canvas and pastels.

Interviewing Jeffrey Lipsky (photo credit, Colin Rhinesmith)

Interviewing Jeffrey Lipsky (photo credit, Colin Rhinesmith)

Under current social art norms, jeFF has chosen a perceived “low art” medium (the computer, the internet) as a source of inspiration for his work and as a means for exposure. The presentation of his art in a self-curated online gallery arguably changes the nature of his work. The debasing of fine art because of its existence in a digital form is a social notion that *must* be re-examined in the information age.

That paper inspired another project on how the nature Second Life builds community. JeFF has shown an active interest in the advancement of artists from around the world by coordinating Second Life workshops for artists to share their work and offer the kind of critique process that is often missed after an artist leaves the art school setting. The quality of jeFF’s art, what he is doing to help change notions of “high” and “low” art, and his emphasis on building community is a model for other artists and an inspiration to society on how to develop the potential of virtual worlds in all layers of cultural production and exchange.

I LOVE YOU

Hearts

Image courtesy of Things are better with a parrot

Remember Valentines Day as a kid? You prayed mom would let you get the valentines that had little tootsie rolls in them (because everyone always wanted one of those). Candy or not you diligently wrote the name of each of your classmates on the pieces of glossy cardboard slightly smaller than index cards. It was a lesson: You gave EVERYONE a Valentines Day card. Sure, somewhere along the line you got didn’t get a card, and got a lesson in rejection. Hey, a lesson is a lesson. And now that you’re older you can appreciate all the Valentines you did get.

But, it seems, these days a lot of energy goes into rejecting Valentines Day. I myself thought about throwing a “Black Thursday” party. “Down with Valentines Day!” I said. Then finally I asked myself - “Why?” With all the memories that led me to write the paragraph above, and a little nuanced reflection, and I’ve made the decision that I truly believe we should celebrate Valentines Day. But the very thought raises objections all around. These are the top three I’ve heard:

A. “It’s a Hallmark holiday”
B. “You should be sweet to your partner everyday, if you need Valentine’s Day there’s a problem.”
C. “It’s too expensive to: 1. Buy flowers 2. Go out to dinner 3. Buy the requisite 5 pounds of Godiva”

The reality:

“A” is just totally False
“B” is True AND False
“C” Totally True (but why should that stop you?)

Is Valentine’s Day a Hallmark holiday? No. It has a history that goes way before Hallmark. Hallmark did what any good American corporation worth its salt should do, and has capitalized - in a big way - on Valentine’s Day. But it’s not “Administrative Professionals” day which, to my knowledge, IS pretty much a Hallmark holiday.

Hallmark sells Christmas cards too. Have we decided that Christmas has become an overblown retail holiday? Yes, actually. BUT, how many of us still participate? We haven’t decided that the retail industry’s occupation of the holiday is grounds for rejecting spending time with friends and family and exchanging gifts. We haven’t let Christmas fall victim to industry-focused moral outrage. Why should Valentines Day suffer such a fate?

I can appreciate the notion that we should be sweet to our partners all the time, we should! But it’s good to stop and, as a whole, have a day dedicated to it too! I say let’s make it even bigger! We almost never stop to say something like, “I LOVE YOU in the way that only a cubicle mate can love another cubicle mate,” to a co-worker. Not so keen on them? How about the UPS carrier? I’m serious! Let’s take back this day and celebrate it with “I LOVE YOUs” all around. On Valentines Day we’ll make sure we take a moment to appreciate and love each other, in the same way that we stop to give thanks that mildly random Thursday in November. If, in this society, we need an excuse to say I LOVE YOU to one another, let Valentine’s Day be that day.

I can understand people getting frustrated at the 50% markup on red roses, and dinner reservations that need to be booked on Jan 2. That’s expensive and frustrating. AND it’s not what Valentine’s Day is supposed to be about–at all. If you’re in a coupling, Valentines Day can be celebrated by a a little wine and a homemade meal. (Or pizza by candlelight, if you fear the stove like me.) Just do a little something - for yourself and your partner - that stands out, even if just a little. If you’re not in a coupling, Valentine’s Day should be no less fun! Let’s de-stigmatize this as some sort of couples-only holiday. Let’s throw parties at the office, after work… let’s take the time to acknowledge and - YES - LOVE the other people who are a part of your daily lives, be they parents, baristas, even fellow commuters - wouldn’t they be wonderfully surprised!

We are making ourselves greater victims of the industry by wasting our efforts and energy expressing our moral outrage than celebrating it on our own grounds. We can reject the industry model AND still celebrate it as a wonderful holiday, acknowledging friends, family, and partners. Valentines Day 2009 expect to hear me say it loud and clear: I LOVE YOU!

The Iconic iPod

The topic of ubicomp came up over dinner tonight. The conversation started when we noticed that the restaurant’s sophisticated sound system was being fed by an iPod, circa gen 2.

The ubiquity of the iPod is revealed at times in the oddest places. I recently traveled jetBlue and was going over the safety card (for laughs, of course) when something caught my eye. In the midst of the masterful iconography illustrating devices not to be used during take-off/landing was an unmistakable stylized iPod.

At first I admittedly went conspiracy theory, wondering if Apple paid even a little bit to do some unlikely product placement. But I quickly let go of that idea. The point of using icons is to communicate ideas purely visually. It is a credit to Apple that it’s device is so popukar as to warrant its own icon on the safety card. It also says a lot about the style of the iPod that it could not be captured by a more generic icon representing digital music players in general.

I’m a little curious how the uninquness of the iPhone will be treated as an icon. It certainly has a unique aesthetic. If it never warrants its own icon will it be a simple lack of market penetration? Or will it be that the iPhone, for all its hype simply isn’t the revolution to the phone industry (in neither design nor technology) that the iPod was for the music player industry.

Pizza, Prims, and Pictures

Hub2 Evening Participants

The final night of the Emerson College Hub2 class was last night. We spent the evening in style with a last minute building session for next week’s presentation to the City of Boston Mayor’s office, a postmortem debrief of the strengths of the class (as well as ::gulp:: the things we need to improve), and a healthy round of pizza (not in the computer lab, of course!).

In the next few days I’ll be posting more about our upcoming meeting, the prep from both class sections, day AND evening, and a few insights about what I hope is around the corner for Hub2.